Rethinking Varroa: A Historical and Ecological Perspective

 By Yan Bali

The varroa mite (Varroa destructor) is often cited as the most significant threat to modern beekeeping, especially for Apis mellifera. However, historical records, scientific research, and ecological evidence suggest that the narrative surrounding varroa's origins and its impact on bees needs re-evaluation. This article explores these perspectives, challenges prevailing assumptions, and highlights the overlooked role of human interference in exacerbating the varroa problem.

Ancient Origins: Varroa Is Not New

Parasites like varroa have been a part of bee ecosystems for millions of years. Fossilized evidence from the Eocene Baltic period (~44 million years ago) shows the existence of Mesostigmata Laelapidae, a parasitic mite closely related to varroa. This discovery underscores that parasitic relationships between mites and bees are ancient and part of nature’s evolutionary balance.

Historical records further support this longevity. In the 1700s, a book titled A Treatise on the Management of Bees mentioned "bee lice" capable of devastating colonies. Tobacco from Morocco was recommended as a treatment. Although varroa mites were not scientifically named at the time, this description aligns with what we know about Varroa destructor. This challenges the assumption that varroa is a recent threat introduced to Apis mellifera colonies.

The 1904 Research and Its Legacy

Scientific studies in 1904 identified Varroa jacobsoni on Apis cerana, the Asian honeybee. This research formed the basis for the belief that Varroa destructor originated on Apis cerana and later shifted to Apis mellifera.

However, these early conclusions are problematic:

1. Species Differentiation: Later research revealed that Varroa destructor and Varroa jacobsoni are distinct species. This calls into question the assumption that Varroa destructor originated on Apis cerana.

2. Commercial Context: In the early 1900s, commercial beekeepers were grappling with unexplained colony losses. Blaming Apis cerana as the source of varroa may have been a convenient explanation, but the evidence for this claim remains weak.

Notably, the "bee lice" mentioned in A Treatise on the Management of Bees predate this research by nearly 200 years. If Varroa destructor was already affecting Apis mellifera colonies at that time, it undermines the theory that it originated from Apis cerana.

Questioning Varroa’s Origins

The hypothesis that Varroa destructor transferred from Apis cerana to Apis mellifera raises several unanswered questions:

1. Geographic Anomalies: In regions like Cairns, Australia, where Apis cerana has existed for decades, varroa infestations have not been observed. If Varroa destructor originated from Apis cerana, why hasn’t it spread there?

2. Multiple Bee Species: Asia hosts several bee species, including Apis dorsata and Apis florea. Why is Apis cerana singled out as the origin of varroa, when other species also coexist with mites?

These inconsistencies suggest that Varroa destructor may not have originated from Apis cerana at all. It is plausible that Varroa destructor evolved alongside Apis mellifera, as historical accounts and ecological evidence indicate.

Human Intervention: The Root Cause of Vulnerability

Unlike Apis cerana, which has developed natural defenses against mites, Apis mellifera lacks these adaptations. This vulnerability is largely due to human interference:

Selective Breeding: Focused on maximizing honey production, breeders have ignored traits like mite resistance, leaving Apis mellifera colonies ill-equipped to handle varroa.

Over-Domestication: Intensive management practices prevent colonies from developing natural behaviors, such as grooming and hygienic brood removal.

The paternalistic approach to beekeeping, where humans control every aspect of a hive’s life, has weakened Apis mellifera’s ability to adapt to parasites like varroa.

Ecological Insights and Regional Case Studies

The resilience of Apis cerana to varroa offers valuable lessons. In Cairns, where Apis cerana has long existed, varroa has not been detected. Conversely, in New South Wales, Apis mellifera colonies are now facing varroa infestations.

Furthermore, reports of varroa in Victoria predate its official detection in New South Wales, yet Australia maintained its "varroa-free" status for years. Such discrepancies raise questions about transparency and the effectiveness of biosecurity measures.

The Natural Role of Varroa in Ecosystems

Parasites like varroa are not inherently destructive. In natural systems, they play a role in maintaining ecological balance. Just as wax moths are found wherever there are bees, varroa is a natural presence in apiaries.

The real issue arises when human practices disrupt this balance. Monoculture beekeeping, chemical treatments, and the global movement of bees create conditions where parasites can thrive unchecked. Recognizing varroa as a natural component of bee ecosystems, rather than an enemy to eradicate, can lead to more sustainable solutions.

A Call for Collaborative Research

To move forward, the beekeeping community and researchers must:

1. Reevaluate Assumptions: Investigate varroa’s origins and evolution with an open mind, free from biases against specific bee species.

2. Promote Resilient Practices: Learn from Apis cerana and encourage natural defenses in Apis mellifera.

3. Challenge Economic Motives: Advocate for transparency and prioritize ecological balance over short-term economic gains.

By understanding varroa’s history and role in bee ecosystems, we can develop strategies that support both bees and beekeepers. Parasites like varroa are not the enemy—they are part of nature’s intricate design. Let us work with nature, not against it.

Conclusion

Varroa is not a new problem; it is a natural presence in bee ecosystems that humans have been slow to recognize and adapt to. Blaming Apis cerana for the spread of Varroa destructor is not only unsubstantiated but also distracts from the real issues: human interference, weakened bee populations, and unsustainable beekeeping practices.

The solution lies in embracing ecological balance, fostering resilience in Apis mellifera, and acknowledging the ancient relationship between bees and their parasites. Only then can we create a future where bees and humans coexist harmoniously.

About the Author

Yan Bali is a dedicated beekeeper, apitherapy practitioner, and visionary advocate for creating healing environments through the wonders of bees. Since beginning their beekeeping journey on September 20, 2014, Yan has worked passionately to transform how humanity perceives and interacts with bees, emphasizing their immense contributions to health, sustainability, and harmony with nature.

Guided by ancestral wisdom, Yan believes that living with bees fosters not only physical health but also enhanced mental clarity and resilience. For over nine years, Yan and their family have thrived on the natural therapies provided by bees, including hive air aromatherapy, sound and frequency therapy, and ethical bee stings "only" from dying bees. Yan’s approach to apitherapy prioritizes prevention over healing, advocating that it is far easier to prevent health issues than to cure them.

Yan believes that Apis cerana is the best bee for apitherapy due to its natural resilience and therapeutic potential. They see Apis cerana as the future of sustainable beekeeping, offering a harmonious way to coexist with bees while preserving their well-being and ecological importance.

As a vocal opponent of harvesting honey, pollen, and royal jelly, Yan sees such practices as exploitative and highly recommends avoiding these products to prevent the enslavement of bees. Instead, they emphasize that the combination of bee hive aromatherapy, bee sound therapy, and bee stings is sufficient to address almost all human health challenges naturally and sustainably.

Through their widely appreciated workshops, Yan (Wayan Gede Adriana) educates participants about the incredible healing potential of bees and inspires a deep sense of care and respect for these vital creatures.

                    Testimonial video

They envision indoor observation hives as a revolutionary step in beekeeping, transforming ordinary spaces into therapeutic environments that foster both well-being and a connection to nature.

Yan is unwavering in their commitment to protecting all bee species and reviving the ancient tradition of coexisting with bees. They challenge conventional views, encouraging people to see allergic reactions as part of the healing process and reducing the fear often associated with bees. Yan’s ultimate goal is to save bees worldwide while inspiring a future where humans and pollinators thrive together in harmony.